Security
OpenSSF Scorecard
This page records the current OpenSSF Scorecard posture for this repository, the known gaps, and the remediation roadmap. The badge in the README links to the live result; this page is the maintained narrative behind it.
Live score
Aggregate score 8.3 / 10 at 2026-10-29T07:04:00Z.
| Check | Score | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Binary-Artifacts | 10 | no binaries found in the repo |
| Branch-Protection | 3 | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| CI-Tests | 10 | 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| CII-Best-Practices | 5 | badge detected: Passing |
| Code-Review | 0 | Found 0/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| Contributors | 0 | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| Dangerous-Workflow | 10 | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | 10 | update tool detected |
| Fuzzing | 10 | project is fuzzed |
| License | 10 | license file detected |
| Maintained | 10 | 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| Packaging | 10 | packaging workflow detected |
| Pinned-Dependencies | 9 | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| SAST | 9 | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| Security-Policy | 10 | security policy file detected |
| Signed-Releases | 10 | 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 10 signed artifacts. |
| Token-Permissions | 10 | GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege |
| Vulnerabilities | 10 | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Refresh: scripts/qa/scorecard-snapshot.sh · Monitoring: .github/workflows/scorecard.yml.
The badge above is regenerated every Monday at 06:00 UTC and on every push to main by .github/workflows/scorecard.yml. The SARIF result is uploaded to GitHub Code Scanning (Security tab) and retained as a 30-day workflow artifact.
Threshold policy
| Score | Action |
|---|---|
| ≥ 8.0 | Healthy. Keep doing what we're doing. |
| 7.0 – 7.9 | Acceptable. Tracked. |
| < 7.0 | Regression — the workflow auto-opens a tracking issue labelled type:security + priority:high. |
Regressions are triaged within one Monday cycle: identify the check that dropped, either remediate or file an exception entry below with a rationale and an expiry date.
Per-check posture (snapshot, main HEAD)
The checks below come from OpenSSF Scorecard's published rubric. Tick marks reflect this repo's posture at the time of writing — the live badge is authoritative if these diverge.
| Check | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Branch-Protection | ⚠ | Classic branch protection on main requires signed commits, linear history, conversation resolution and five status checks, enforced for admins, with 0 required approvals (see .github/BRANCH_PROTECTION.md). Scorecard scores it below maximal, chiefly because no approving review is required. .github/rulesets/main.json is not applied. |
| Code-Review | ⚠ | Single-maintainer repo; PRs are self-merged after CI. Scorecard scores 0 here by design (see Open findings below). |
| Signed-Commits | ✓ | Enforced by pre-push hook (scripts/git-hooks/pre-push) and at-push by branch protection (#853 + #857). |
| Dependency-Update-Tool | ✓ | Dependabot configured for github-actions / npm / docker / devcontainers / uv / gomod / cargo. |
| Fuzzing | ✓ | Native Go fuzz harnesses under fuzz/ and in the Go modules under defaults/dot_local/share/, run by .github/workflows/fuzz.yml, plus the ClusterFuzzLite setup in .clusterfuzzlite/ and fuzz/oss-fuzz/. The shell install.sh harness lives under fuzz/install/ (#881). See FUZZING.md. |
| License | ✓ | Dual Apache-2.0 / MIT at repo root (LICENSE-APACHE, LICENSE-MIT). |
| Maintained | ✓ | Active commit cadence; the README lists the current dotfiles_version. |
| Pinned-Dependencies | ⚠ | Closed 8 of 14 findings this cycle (every Dockerfile base + every workflow action + 2 curl | sh installers + the npm install -g npm upgrade step). The residual findings are dismissed by design (see Open findings). |
| SAST | ✓ | CodeQL (.github/workflows/codeql.yml) + Checkov + Grype. |
| SBOM | ✓ | Generated per PR by sbom-diff.yml and per release by security-release.yml. |
| Security-Policy | ✓ | SECURITY.md + this page + docs/security/THREAT_MODEL.md. |
| Token-Permissions | ✓ | Top-level permissions: blocks restricted to contents: read. write scopes scoped to the jobs that need them (#886). |
| Vulnerabilities | ✓ | Grype gate hard-fails on high / critical on main (#852). |
| Webhooks | n/a | No external webhooks configured. |
| CI-Tests | ✓ | Linux + macOS (Apple Silicon) matrix; Windows when shell or Windows files change. |
| CII-Best-Practices | ✓ | OpenSSF Best Practices badge at passing tier. |
| Dangerous-Workflow | ✓ | No pull_request_target with checkout-PR-code anti-pattern. |
| Packaging | ✓ | npm publish --provenance via OIDC (.github/workflows/npm-publish.yml); policy-bundle-release.yml for the policy artifact. |
| Signed-Releases | ✓ | SLSA provenance (.intoto.jsonl) and Cosign keyless signatures (.sig + .pem) attached via security-release.yml (#876). |
Open findings
Scorecard raises these as alerts at https://github.com/sebastienrousseau/dotfiles/security/code-scanning. Each row gives the dismissal reason and the exact comment text to paste when triaging. Every alert listed here has been dismissed with that reason; when Scorecard re-raises one (for example after the line moves), dismiss it again with the same text.
Bucket 1 — Dismiss in the UI
Scorecard flags every npm install, pip install, go install, and curl | sh invocation under the Pinned-Dependencies check. The rows below either belong to user-facing tooling that installs the latest release on purpose or are false positives in Scorecard's regex.
| Path | Reason | Comment to paste |
|---|---|---|
defaults/.chezmoitemplates/aliases/legal/legal.aliases.sh:64 | Won't fix | User-facing gen-notice alias runs go install github.com/google/go-licenses@latest in a throwaway container to build a NOTICE file. Pinning by SHA would require users to update the alias manually on every upstream change. Intentional. |
plugins/system/libexec/system/upgrade.sh:145 | Won't fix | npm update -g in dot update --globals, which the user asks for to bring global packages to their latest release. Pinning defeats it. Intentional. |
plugins/tool/libexec/tool.sh:112 | False positive | npm install --package-lock-only --ignore-scripts --silent generates a lockfile and does NOT fetch packages. Scorecard's regex matches npm install blindly; this invocation has no supply-chain surface. |
install/provision/run_onchange_10-linux-packages.sh.tmpl:383 | Won't fix | Already exact-version-pins aider-chat==0.86.2. Scorecard wants sha256-hash pinning, which would require a ~2,700-line lockfile covering all 108 transitive deps and re-generated on every aider release — disproportionate maintenance for a single optional provisioning install. |
Bucket 2 — Architectural (1 item)
| Alert | Why architectural |
|---|---|
CodeReviewID (high) — score 0 | Scorecard requires every merged PR to record an approval review by a different GitHub user than the author. This repo is single-maintainer; PRs are self-merged after CI. The fix path is either (a) onboard a co-maintainer who reviews PRs before merge, or (b) accept the finding. Dismiss as Won't fix with comment: "Single-maintainer project — no second reviewer available. CI gates (five required status checks per PR, the Merge Gate among them) substitute for human review." |
Closed this cycle
| Date | Score | Alerts open | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 6.5 | 28 | First clean publish after fixing the scorecard.yml uses:-only restriction (#885). Findings had been hidden by publish-step 400s until then. |
| 2026-05-14 | 6.5 | 11 | Closed 17 of 28: 10× TokenPermissions (#886), 6× Dockerfile bases (#886), 1× gitleaks fixture (#884). |
| 2026-05-14 | 6.5 | 9 | Closed 2× curl | sh installers (#888). |
| 2026-05-14 | 6.5 | 8 | Closed 1× npm install -g npm@… via Node 24 bump (#889). |
| 2026-05-17 | 7.6 | 7 | v0.2.502 released; Cosign keyless signing live (#876 implementation landed in security-release.yml sbom job). |
| 2026-05-17 | 7.6 | 6 | SLSA Release Attestation pipeline unblocked (PR #894 — 6 prior releases had failed identically). v0.2.502 backfilled with .intoto.jsonl + .sig + .pem triplet. Signed-Releases should bump from 3 to ~10 on next Scorecard re-scrape. |
| 2026-05-17 | 7.6 | — | Added MAINTAINERS.md + GOVERNANCE.md at repo root. Provides the formal context for the Code-Review 0/30 score (solo maintainer) and unblocks the CII Best Practices badge application. |
Open work
harden-runnerblock-mode adoption (#878): should tighten theToken-Permissionscheck further.Branch-Protection3/10: the live score is held down by the 0-approval review setting on a single-maintainer repo (see Bucket 2).
Enabling Branch-Protection + Webhooks checks in the workflow (one-time PAT setup)
The repository's own scorecard.yml run needs a fine-grained Personal Access Token with Administration: read scope to read the Branch-Protection and Webhooks checks; without it both return -1 ("internal error") in that run. (The public snapshot above comes from the Scorecard API, which scores Branch-Protection on its own.) The workflow already wires this up, and the SCORECARD_TOKEN secret is not set today.
Steps (one-time, repo owner):
- Go to https://github.com/settings/personal-access-tokens/new
- Resource owner:
sebastienrousseau· Repository access: onlysebastienrousseau/dotfiles - Repository permissions →
Administration: read-onlyandMetadata: read-only - Expiration: 1 year (set a calendar reminder to rotate; document the rotation in this file when done)
- Generate the token, copy it once
- Add as a secret named
SCORECARD_TOKENat https://github.com/sebastienrousseau/dotfiles/settings/secrets/actions/new - Next Scorecard run (manual via
gh workflow run scorecard.ymlor weekly cron) picks it up automatically - Expected effect:
Branch-Protection-1→ 10/10 if all rules are correctly configured;Webhooks-1→ 10/10 (no webhooks present).
The PAT secret is optional. When absent, the workflow falls back to ${{ github.token }} and Scorecard continues to run, only with those two checks at -1. Adding the PAT cannot reduce any other check's score — it's a strict improvement.
Exceptions
| Check | Expiry | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| (none currently) | — | — |
If you add an exception, include the check name, an expiry date (don't allow indefinite), and the rationale. Re-evaluate every quarter.
Refreshing this document
# Re-count open alerts:
# Trigger Scorecard manually:
If a new category appears, add a row to the matching bucket. If a remediation closes one of the rows above, delete the row.
References
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml— the scanner workflow (split intoanalysis+track-regressionjobs per #885).- Scorecard project.
- Scorecard checks reference.
- Tracking issue #869.